Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 4 2015 | Page 32

Sexual abuse initiative Sexual Abuse Initiative: A Summary Over the past year, Council has proposed a number of changes – both to the legislation which governs us, and to our own processes and practices – to better protect and support Ontario patients from physician sexual abuse. Some of the changes to our own processes include:  aking enhancements to a m program that provides funding for therapy/counselling to survivors of sexual abuse committed by physicians;  aving all physical sexual contact h between a physician and a patient result in mandatory revocation of a physician’s certificate of registration; c ontinuing efforts to improve investigative timelines for sexual abuse; expanding mandatory revocation in circumstances where physicians are found to have engaged in other specified acts of professional misconduct – such as being convicted of a specific criminal sexual offence or engaging in sexual impropriety with a patient under the age of 16; a dopting a framework for guiding decisions to accept or order gender-based restrictions on a physician’s certificate; implementing a new internal policy on reporting information to the Police;  nhancing the informae tion and resources on the College’s website regarding sexual abuse; c ontinuing work in relation to Education and Training for different audiences, including College committees, the profession and medical students. 32 Council has also directed that the following amendments be made to strengthen sexual abuse provisions in the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991: providing patients with a guaranteed right to communicate the impact of abuse on them by submitting victim impact statements to the Discipline Committee following a greater range of professional misconduct findings; increasing protection for the privacy interest of witnesses involved in discipline cases by raising the legal threshold for the production and disclosure of confidential records of a patient not in the possession of the College;  aving the voices of patients heard h in more cases by guaranteeing their right to make submissions to the Discipline Committee pr [܈˜[